Banakacherla 

bias  and beyond

Image: polavaram project

Banakacherla 

While civil society fiercely criticised Kalaeshwaram Lift Irrigation Scheme, its silence on Banakacherla  project is troubling

Estimated cost Rs 80,112 cr

BanakachErla 

Aim:  To divert surplus Godavari waters to Penna basin via Krishna River 

Purpose:  To provide drinking water to 80 lakh people and irrigate 7.5 lakh acres, primarily in Andhra Pradesh’s drought-prone Rayalaseema region

Banakacherla 

Structured in three segments

Segment I  Involves transferring water from Polavaram project to Prakasam Barrage on Krishna River

BanakachErla 

Structured in three segments

Segment II  Channels water from Prakasam Barrage to a proposed 150 TMC reservoir at Bollapalli in Guntur district

Banakacherla 

Structured in three segments

Segment III  Diverts water  from Bollapalli to Banakacherla  regulator in Nandyal district

KLIS vs Banakacherla: The Double Standards  

While the Kaleshwaram Lift Irrigation Scheme was dissected from all angles, the Banakacherla project, despite its ecological risks — escapes scrutiny

KLIS vs Banakacherla: The Double Standards  

KLIS: Built entirely with Telangana’s funds, with zero contribution from the Centre. Despite this, it faced relentless scrutiny — legal, environmental, and media-led

Banakacherla:  Proposes laying pipelines through the ecologically sensitive Nallamala forest, but is seeing no public opposition, environmental activism, or judicial intervention

KLIS vs Banakacherla: The Double Standards  

KLIS transformed Telangana’s irrigation landscape in just five years — a feat comparable to what the Dowleswaram Barrage achieved for the Godavari delta over a century, and Nagarjuna Sagar did for Krishna and Guntur over four decades

KLIS vs Banakacherla: The Double Standards