Court rejects Trump’s bid to delay sentencing in hush money case

 Clears the way for him to be sentenced days before he returns to the presidency

Washington: A divided Supreme Court has rejected President-elect Donald Trump’s bid to delay his sentencing in his hush money case in New York.

The court’s 5-4 order clears the way for Judge Juan M Merchan to impose a sentence on Friday on Trump, who was convicted in what prosecutors called an attempt to cover up a $130,000 hush money payment to porn actor Stormy Daniels. Trump has denied any liaison with Daniels or any wrongdoing.

---

Chief Justice John Roberts and Justice Amy Coney Barrett joined with the court’s three liberals in rejecting his emergency motion.

They found his sentencing wouldn’t be a serious burden since Merchan has indicated he won’t give Trump jail time, fines or probation.

Trump’s arguments against the verdict, meanwhile, can be handled as part of the regular appeals process, the majority found.

Justices Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito, Neil Gorsuch and Brett Kavanaugh would have delayed the sentencing, the order states.

Trump’s attorneys have argued that evidence used in the Manhattan trial violated last summer’s Supreme Court ruling giving Trump broad immunity from prosecution over acts he took as president.

At the least, they have said, the sentencing should be delayed while their appeals play out to avoid distracting Trump during the presidential transition.

Prosecutors pushed back, saying there’s no reason for the court to take the “extraordinary step” of intervening in a state case now. Trump’s attorneys haven’t shown that an hourlong virtual hearing would be a serious disruption, and a pause would likely mean pushing the case past the Jan 20 inauguration, creating a yearslong delay in sentencing if it happens at all.