Parliamentary panel suggests suspension instead of removal of ministers

A parliamentary panel has recommended suspending, instead of permanently removing, the Prime Minister, Union ministers and chief ministers detained for 30 consecutive days on serious criminal charges. It also proposed an automatic reversal clause and fast-track trials for such cases

New Delhi: Amid concerns raised by opposition parties, a parliamentary panel has recommended that the Prime Minister, Union ministers and chief ministers be suspended, and not permanently removed from their posts, if they are detained for 30 consecutive days on charges of serious offences.

It also proposed an automatic reversal clause if such persons are acquitted or if the prosecution does not proceed within a specified period.

---

The joint committee of Parliament examining the 130th Constitution Amendment Bill made two specific and three general recommendations.

Introduced last August, the Bill seeks to automatically remove the Prime Minister, ministers or chief ministers on the 31st day of their detention if they do not step down on their own.

The opposition had dubbed the Bill a tool to destabilise governments run by it.

Most opposition parties had opted out of the joint committee examining the Bill.

In its report, likely to be adopted this week, the panel has proposed that the term “removal” be replaced with “suspension”, that is, “ministers facing specified criminal charges should be suspended, not permanently removed, pending the outcome of legal proceedings”.

It also defined “serious criminal offences”, saying the term should refer to offences punishable with imprisonment of five years or more.

Proposing the introduction of a sunset or automatic reversal clause, it said the suspension should automatically end if the minister is acquitted or if the prosecution does not proceed within a specified period.

The panel said the safeguard would ensure reappointment and that the suspension does not become permanent for those found not guilty by the courts.

The joint committee also recommended that cases involving high-level constitutional functionaries should be tried in fast-track or special courts, in line with the Supreme Court’s directions.

The proposed law should include a separate schedule listing offences punishable with imprisonment of five years or more to clearly identify the offences that would entail suspension, the panel said.

The Bill was introduced with the aim of ensuring that governments are not run from jail.

If the recommendations are accepted, the Ministry of Home Affairs will approach the Union Cabinet with the proposed amendments and later introduce official amendments in the Lok Sabha.