‘Hari Hara Veera Mallu’ Review: Pawan Kalyan’s period saga has heart, but lacks polish
An outlaw on a royal mission faces betrayal during a daring escape, leading to a deeper quest involving the Koh-i-Noor and a brutal emperor, setting the stage for an epic sequel.
Updated On - 24 July 2025, 06:32 PM
Hyderabad: Set in the 1650s, Hari Hara Veera Mallu follows Veera Mallu (Pawan Kalyan), an outlaw with a sharp mind and a cause rooted in justice. Tasked with escaping from the King of Kolluru and taking a woman named Panchami (Nidhhi Agerwal) with him, Veera sets the plan in motion. But during the escape, Panchami reveals her true colours, shifting the course of the mission and adding an emotional sting of betrayal. Soon after, Qutub Shah (Dalip Tahil) assigns Veera a new mission: to steal the legendary Koh-i-Noor diamond from the Mughal emperor Aurangazeb (Bobby Deol). But behind this mission lies something deeper: a personal history, waiting to unfold.
After years of delay and changing hands, Hari Hara Veera Mallu: Part 1 – Sword vs Spirit has finally arrived. While not everything lands perfectly, the film delivers strong moments, powered by Pawan Kalyan’s solid screen presence and emotional weight.
Pawan brings calm intensity to the role. Even with his real-life duties as Deputy Chief Minister, his focus on the character is clear. His emotional scenes rooted in dharma feel honest, and his command in action scenes is sharp. He even directed the Chowki Dana fight sequence, one of the best parts of the film, filled with grit and cinematic energy.
Bobby Deol plays Aurangazeb with a ruthless edge. Though his screen time is short, his cold stare and violent energy set the tone for what’s to come in the sequel. Their real face-off is yet to happen, but the build-up works.
Nidhhi Agerwal makes a mark, especially because of the surprise turn in Panchami’s character. Sathyaraj appears briefly but leaves an impact as Veera’s mentor.
Kota Srinivasa Rao’s role stands out too, his screen time is longer than expected, and his presence brings a sense of warmth and nostalgia, especially after his recent passing.
Rest of the supporting cast including Nassar, Subbaraju, Raghu Babu, Ayyappa Das, Kabir Singh Duhan, Sunil have delivered their parts well.
The action scenes, from the Machilipatnam port fight to the Kolluru Kusthi, the Charminar battle, and especially the Chowki Dana segment, are well-executed and engaging. But the film’s weak spot is its visual effects. Horse-riding scenes and travel sequences, which form a big part of the film, suffer from poor CGI that breaks the immersion.
The first half is slow-paced and takes its time to set things up. The second half is better but has a few dragged-out portions. With much of the drama saved for Part 2, some scenes feel like placeholders. Still, the emotional high points, especially in the second half, keep the interest alive.
Technically, MM Keeravaani’s background score adds life to the film. His music lifts the emotional and action scenes. Cinematographers Gnana Sekhar VS and Manoj Paramahamsa capture the period world with detail. Editing by Praveen KL works well in the beginning but could’ve been tighter later. Direction-wise, Krish’s hand is seen in the rooted storytelling, while Jyothi Krishna, who completed the shoot, does a decent job of holding it together.
Verdict:
Hari Hara Veera Mallu isn’t flawless but offers enough to engage. Pawan Kalyan’s committed performance, a few solid twists, and powerful action scenes like Chowki Dana give the film its strength. The slow pacing and weak VFX pull it back, but the story sets up strong ground for a bigger, more gripping sequel. Worth a watch for the action and Pawan’s screen power.