Friday, Jul 10, 2026
English News
  • Hyderabad
  • Telangana
  • AP News
  • India
  • World
  • Entertainment
  • Sport
  • Science and Tech
  • Business
  • Rewind
  • ...
    • NRI
    • View Point
    • cartoon
    • My Space
    • Education Today
    • Reviews
    • Property
    • Lifestyle
E-Paper
  • NRI
  • View Point
  • cartoon
  • My Space
  • Reviews
  • Education Today
  • Property
  • Lifestyle
Home | India | Modi Surname Remark Bjp Mla Files Caveat In Rahul Gandhi Defamation Case

‘Modi’ surname remark: BJP MLA files caveat in Rahul Gandhi defamation case

BJP MLA Purnesh Modi has filed a caveat in the SC seeking that he be heard if Rahul Gandhi moves a plea challenging the high court verdict.

By PTI
Published Date - 12 July 2023, 02:46 PM
‘Modi’ surname remark: BJP MLA files caveat in Rahul Gandhi defamation case
whatsapp facebook twitter telegram

New Delhi:  BJP MLA Purnesh Modi, the complainant in the defamation case against Rahul Gandhi, has filed a caveat in the Supreme Court seeking that he be heard if the Congress leader moves a plea challenging the high court verdict refusing to stay his conviction in the Modi surname remark case.

A single judge bench of the Gujarat High Court had on July 7 dismissed Gandhi’s plea seeking a stay on his conviction in the defamation case.

Also Read

  • Congress is anti-farmer party: K Laxman
  • Saddened by loss of lives due to heavy rain, landslides in north India: Rahul Gandhi
  • Haryana: Rahul Gandhi interacts with farmers in Sonepat

According to the apex court website, Purnesh Modi filed the caveat on the same day in the top court through his lawyer P S Sudheer.

A caveat is filed in an appellate court by a litigant seeking an opportunity of being heard if any order is passed on the appeal of an opponent challenging the order or judgement of the court below.

In a setback to 53-year-old Gandhi, Justice Hemant Prachchhak of the high court had dismissed the appeal of Gandhi saying “it is now the need of the hour to have purity in politics”.

It also noted that the representatives of people should be “men of clear antecedent” and that a stay on conviction is not a rule, but an exception resorted to only in rare cases and there was no reasonable ground to stay his conviction.

A stay on Gandhi’s conviction would have paved the way for his reinstatement as a Lok Sabha MP.

The Congress later said it will move the Supreme Court against the verdict and alleged that the government is finding “newer techniques” to throttle his voice as it is rattled by him speaking the truth.

Purnesh Modi, a former minister in the Gujarat government, had filed a criminal defamation case in 2019 against Gandhi over his “How come all thieves have Modi as the common surname?” remark made during an election rally at Kolar in Karnataka on April 13, 2019.

A metropolitan magistrate’s court in Surat on March 23 this year sentenced the former Congress president to two years in jail after convicting him under Indian Penal Code (IPC) sections 499 and 500 (criminal defamation).

Following the verdict, Gandhi, elected to the Lok Sabha from Wayanad in Kerala in 2019, was disqualified as a Member of Parliament under the provisions of the Representation of the People Act.
Gandhi then challenged the order in a sessions court in Surat along with an application seeking a stay to the conviction. While granting him bail, the sessions court on April 20 refused to stay the conviction, following which, he had knocked the doors of high court.

  • Follow Us :
  • Tags
  • criminal defamation case
  • Gandhi
  • IPC
  • MLA Purnesh Modi

Related News

  • Congress seeks NTA disbanding after alleged NET irregularities

    Congress seeks NTA disbanding after alleged NET irregularities

  • Congress leaders pay tribute to YS Rajasekhara Reddy on birth anniversary

    Congress leaders pay tribute to YS Rajasekhara Reddy on birth anniversary

  • Congress demands Dharmendra Pradhan’s resignation, seeks education reforms

    Congress demands Dharmendra Pradhan’s resignation, seeks education reforms

  • BRS questions Congress over Telangana’s stand on VB-G RAM G scheme

    BRS questions Congress over Telangana’s stand on VB-G RAM G scheme

Latest News

  • Abhinandh PB, Bernadette Szocs lead Goa Challengers to winning start in UTT Season 7

    44 mins ago
  • FIFA WC 2026: Seventeen players risk semifinal suspension over yellow cards

    1 hour ago
  • Humpy, Divya and Vaishali to lead India’s challenge at 2026 Cairns Cup in Saint Louis

    1 hour ago
  • Shreyas Iyer’s unbeaten 80 lifts India to 158/7 against England in fourth T20I

    2 hours ago
  • Wimbledon 2026: Linda Noskova sets up all-Czech final against Karolina Muchova

    2 hours ago
  • MAUD sanctions Rs 77.31 crore to upgrade 404 traffic signals in Hyderabad

    2 hours ago
  • Anvita Khammam Aces beat Hyderabad E-Champions by 10 runs

    2 hours ago
  • Iran condemns US strikes on maritime infrastructure at IMO meet

    2 hours ago

company

  • Home
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy

business

  • Subscribe

telangana today

  • Telangana
  • Hyderabad
  • Latest News
  • Entertainment
  • World
  • Andhra Pradesh
  • Science & Tech
  • Sport

follow us

  • Telangana Today Telangana Today
Telangana Today Telangana Today

© Copyrights 2024 TELANGANA PUBLICATIONS PVT. LTD. All rights reserved. Powered by Veegam