-
The real challenge is whether the Supreme Court guidelines on bulldozers are followed in letter and spirit
-
Appointed to the Supreme Court on May 13, 2016, he has delivered numerous landmark judgments over his eight-year tenure. Notably, he was part of a five-judge Constitution Bench, led by CJI Chandrachud, that upheld the revocation of Article 370 and directed the Election Commission to arrange elections for the Jammu and Kashmir Assembly by September 30, 2024.
-
President Droupadi Murmu will administer the oath of office to Justice Khanna at Rashtrapati Bhavan in a ceremony scheduled for 10 am. Justice Khanna will succeed Justice DY Chandrachud, who retired on Sunday, and his term will run until May 13, 2025.
President Droupadi Murmu will administer the oath of office to Justice Khanna at Rashtrapati Bhavan in a ceremony scheduled for 10 am. Justice Khanna will succeed Justice DY Chandrachud, who retired on Sunday, and his term will run until May 13, 2025.
-
Collapse of Jet Airways is a disheartening development for India -- the third-largest domestic aviation market in the world
-
The Hyderabad MP posted on X that the 1967 judgment wrongly denied Aligarh Muslim University its minority status, which he argued it rightfully holds. He referenced Article 30 of the Indian Constitution, which grants minorities the right to establish and manage their educational institutions as they see fit.
-
In his plea, Paul sought seeking a "comprehensive investigation by the CBI into the allegations of corruption and mismanagement surrounding the procurement and preparation of the Laddu Prasadam"
-
A Bench led by Chief Justice D.Y. Chandrachud upheld the lenders' plea opposing the transfer of ownership of the grounded airline to the Jalan Kalrock Consortium (JKC). The Bench, which also included Justices J.B. Pardiwala and Manoj, used its extraordinary powers under Article 142 of the Constitution to ensure "complete justice" between the parties, ordering the immediate appointment of a liquidator.
-
Says if change in eligibility criteria is permitted under rules or advertisement, the change will have to satisfy the test of non-arbitrariness
-
Set aside NCLAT decision upholding the resolution plan of Jet Airways and approves transfer of its ownership to Jalan Kalrock Consortium
-
A bench of Chief Justice D Y Chandrachud and Justices J B Pardiwala and Manoj Misra will pronounce the verdict which was reserved on October 16.
-
The validity of Section 6A of the Citizenship Act will collide with Section 6B of the controversial CAA
-
The High Court on Wednesday directed the State government to consider appointing a dedicated Commission to conduct the contemporaneous rigorous empirical data qua the reservations for Backward Classes in local bodies in the State in accordance with the Apex Court directions
-
Supreme Court verdict upholding States’ right to regulate taxes on industrial alcohol is a welcome step
-
A bench led by Justice B.R. Gavai criticized the CBI's counsel, warning that it might impose exemplary costs and could also "reward" the probe agency with "compliments" in the form of adverse remarks in its judicial order. Joined by Justice K.V. Vishwanathan, the bench hinted at recording negative comments against the CBI for filing what it deemed a "frivolous" plea solely due to the accused's "high profile" status.
-
Asking the accused to cooperate in the trial, Dhall was released on bail on conditions fixed by the trial court, as per the Supreme Court's order
-
A bench, headed by Justice B.R. Gavai, issued notice on a writ petition filed by Mamta Tripathi seeking quashing of the criminal cases and in the meantime, asked the UP Police to not take any coercive step against the petitioner
-
The resolution also objected to a proposed museum at a location where they had demanded a cafe cum lounge for the members of the Bar
-
Addressing mediapersons at Telangana Bhavan, Rama Rao exuded confidence that the High Court verdict would be in favour of Group-1 job aspirants
-
The bench, led by Chief Justice of India DY Chandrachud, noted that students had already arrived at examination centers and felt that issuing an interim order at this stage would cause "substantial dislocation" in conducting the exam, which the bench was unwilling to do.
-
The Court cannot interfere with the examination, students must have already reached the examination hall, it said