-
The Supreme Court on Wednesday allowed the impleadment of eight farmer unions as respondents in the petitions seeking the removal of protestors from the borders in the national capital.
-
The top court apprehended that the protest could become a national issue and emphasized for reaching a solution via negotiations through this committee.
-
It also took cognisance of the fire incident in a designated COVID-19 hospital in Gujarat's Rajkot in which several patients had died.
-
A bench headed by Justice D.Y. Chandrachud told senior advocate Milind Sathe, representing Republic TV, "this petition is ambitious in nature".
-
The apex court had in its November 9, 2019, judgment on the Ram Janmabhoomi - Babari Masjid dispute given the entire 2.77 acres of land for the construction of a temple
-
SC agreed to hear an appeal filed by Franklin Templeton against the Karnataka HC order which stopped the fund house from winding up its debt fund schemes without prior consent of the investors
-
Senior advocate Harish Salve, appearing for Flipkart, said that CCI doesn't look at the findings of the Government and relied on the tax department findings and misread the findings of the tax tribunal
-
“We have seen Gujarat's reply. Five people have died on the seventh floor. What kind of affidavit is this? No attempts should be made to suppress the facts,” said a bench headed by Justice Ashok Bhushan.
-
The bench said that the Gujarat government must be answerable and there can't just be an inquiry and report
-
The bench also said the Supreme Court, high courts and lower courts must be alive to the misuse of criminal law by the state machinery.
-
A three-judge bench of the apex court, headed by Chief Justice of India (CJI) Sharad Arvind Bobde, rejected the plea. The apex court had, on November 18, reserved its verdict after hearing from the respective parties.
-
The parole, granted to the convict by the Madras High Court, was ending on Monday and now stands extended by one more week.
-
"Under the BJP, the CBI has become a 'paan patti ki dukaan' (paan shop) It goes anywhere, books anybody, particularly in non-BJP ruled states," said Shaikh, a senior Congress leader, while reacting to the Supreme Court verdict.
-
Says Central agency cannot investigate in State govt’s jurisdiction without its consent
-
A bench of Justices D Y Chandrachud and Indu Malhotra noted that Centre's affidavit has been filed indicating the steps which have been taken in terms of earlier order of the top court.
-
The Central government, in its affidavit filed before the apex court on October 25, had stated that the interest waiver scheme can be availed by borrowers in specified loan accounts.
-
The PIL, jointly filed by advocates GS Mani, Pradeep Kumar Yadav and SK Singh, contended that Jagan Mohan Reddy is facing more than 20 criminal cases.
-
Traders who spent lakhs on setting up stalls hope to make brisk sales as SC gives a two-hour window
-
A vacation bench of Justices D Y Chandrachud and Indira Banerjee, which ordered that the accused shall not try to meet any witness in the case, said their release should not be delayed
-
The top court expressed concern over state governments targeting some individuals on the basis of ideology and difference of opinion.