‘Awful decision’: Sundar’s dismissal sparks debate
Sundar adjudged caught behind off Australian captain Pat Cummins. The on-field umpire, Saikat Sharfuddoula, initially ruled Sundar not out, but Australia opted for a review
Sydney: The dismissal of Indian all-rounder Washington Sundar on day one of the New Year’s Test at the SCG became a topic of debate. It came during India’s first innings when Sundar was adjudged caught behind off Australian captain Pat Cummins. The on-field umpire, Saikat Sharfuddoula, had initially ruled Sundar not out, but Australia opted for a review.
TV umpire Joel Wilson spent considerable time analysing the replays to determine whether Sundar had gloved the short-pitched delivery. The snickometer showed a spike as the ball passed near Sundar’s glove, but the visuals raised questions. One frame appeared to show no spike when the ball was closest to the glove, while the subsequent frame captured a spike.
Also Read
Wilson concluded that the evidence was sufficient to overturn the on-field decision. The final verdict flashed on the big screen – “OUT” – and Sundar was visibly stunned. He attempted to protest but was directed to leave the field, departing for a score of 14.
The decision sparked outrage as former England captain Michael Vaughan called the ruling “awful”, expressing disbelief. “No way is that OUT, that’s an awful decision,” Vaughan posted on X.
Robin Uthappa, former India batter said, “I’m sorry, but that’s a crap decision! Sure, there was a spike, but from the side angle, there was a clear space between the ball and the glove. There is a lot of ambiguity with these kinds of decisions. The benefit must go to the batter,” Uthappa posted on X.
However, former umpire Simon Taufel defended Wilson, explaining that the protocols justified the decision.
“What Joel Wilson’s looking for here is that spike up to one frame past the glove, and he’s got that spike. There’s nothing else out there, and the ball is underneath the glove. The third umpire is well and truly within his rights, according to the protocols, to determine that’s conclusive evidence for ball on glove,” Taufel stated on Channel 7.
