-
"To keep their grip on people, these parties created a demon, saying that if Article 370 is removed, Jammu and Kashmir would burn and it would break away from the country," PM Modi said.
-
Today's Morning News includes: J&K breaking free from dynastic rule, Modi virtually inaugurates KV building in Nizamabad, Maharashtra Maratha quota Bill
-
Yesterday, Pakistan dismissed the Indian Supreme Court's verdict upholding the abrogation of Article 370 as having "no legal value," emphasizing that international law does not recognize India's "unilateral and illegal actions" of August 5, 2019.
-
The BJP govt can no longer delay implementation of the twin promises: restoring statehood and holding elections
-
Shah welcomed the verdict, stating that since the visionary decision by Prime Minister Narendra Modi on August 5, 2019, to revoke Article 370, peace and normalcy had returned to Jammu and Kashmir.
-
A five-judge Constitution bench comprising Chief Justice of India DY Chandrachud, Justices Sanjay Kishan Kaul, Sanjiv Khanna, BR Gavai, and Surya Kant delivered the verdict.
-
The apex court also upheld the validity of the decision to carve out the union territory of Ladakh from Jammu and Kashmir in August 2019.
-
Security forces have been deployed at many places in the valley to maintain law and order, they added.
-
Five-judge constitution bench comprising Chief Justice of India DY Chandrachud, Justices Sanjay Kishan Kaul, Sanjiv Khanna, BR Gavai, and Surya Kant will pass the judgement today.
-
The sudden spurt in violent attacks must prompt the Centre to introspect about its Kashmir policy
-
We can't ignore the decisions taken on August 5, 2019. The decision (Abrogation of Article 370) was not in accordance with the Constitution. It was unilateral and undemocratic, said Hasnain Masoodi
-
Five-judge Constitution bench of the Supreme Court reserves the judgement after hearing the arguments for 16 days
-
Earlier in the day, Additional Solicitor General K.M. Natraj contended that Article 370 is the only provision in the Constitution which has a self-destruction mechanism.
-
The Centre’s argument that the question of full statehood to J&K will be decided based on the degree of normalcy is misplaced
-
Senior advocate Kapil Sibal asked Centre to not make mockery of democracy after Solicitor General Mehta said that right people were under house arrest as there was no bandhs post abrogation of Article 370 in Jammu and Kashmir
-
Elections in Jammu and Kashmir can take place any time and a decision on the issue has to be taken by the poll panel, the Centre told the Supreme Court
-
Central government on Thursday told the Supreme Court that it cannot give any exact timeframe for the restoration of statehood in Jammu and Kashmir
-
The Supreme Court on Tuesday asked Attorney General and Solicitor General to seek instructions from the Central government over the timeframe to restore statehood of the erstwhile state of Jammu and Kashmir
-
A five-judge bench headed by Chief Justice D Y Chandrachud took note of the suspension of Zahoor Ahmad Bhat, who had argued before the top court on August 24 as petitioner in-person in the case
-
Though, the petitioners have themselves conceded before the Supreme Court that of course, the Indian Constitution is superior between the two Constitutions.
