-
We can't ignore the decisions taken on August 5, 2019. The decision (Abrogation of Article 370) was not in accordance with the Constitution. It was unilateral and undemocratic, said Hasnain Masoodi
-
Five-judge Constitution bench of the Supreme Court reserves the judgement after hearing the arguments for 16 days
-
Earlier in the day, Additional Solicitor General K.M. Natraj contended that Article 370 is the only provision in the Constitution which has a self-destruction mechanism.
-
The Centre’s argument that the question of full statehood to J&K will be decided based on the degree of normalcy is misplaced
-
Senior advocate Kapil Sibal asked Centre to not make mockery of democracy after Solicitor General Mehta said that right people were under house arrest as there was no bandhs post abrogation of Article 370 in Jammu and Kashmir
-
Elections in Jammu and Kashmir can take place any time and a decision on the issue has to be taken by the poll panel, the Centre told the Supreme Court
-
Central government on Thursday told the Supreme Court that it cannot give any exact timeframe for the restoration of statehood in Jammu and Kashmir
-
The Supreme Court on Tuesday asked Attorney General and Solicitor General to seek instructions from the Central government over the timeframe to restore statehood of the erstwhile state of Jammu and Kashmir
-
A five-judge bench headed by Chief Justice D Y Chandrachud took note of the suspension of Zahoor Ahmad Bhat, who had argued before the top court on August 24 as petitioner in-person in the case
-
Though, the petitioners have themselves conceded before the Supreme Court that of course, the Indian Constitution is superior between the two Constitutions.
-
Supreme Court said on Thursday the surrender of Jammu and Kashmir's sovereignty to India was "absolutely complete" with the accession
-
Gains from revoking Article 370 can materialise only when Kashmiris are made partners in their own development
-
Chidambaram said, "Government of India's false claims about normalcy to the Supreme Court are exposed by their actions driven by paranoia."
-
Officials stated that stringent security measures have been implemented throughout the Union Territory to ensure peace and stability.
-
On August 5, 2019, the Centre revoked the special status of Jammu and Kashmir under Article 370.
-
The bench said that there are only two highly debatable issues -- whether Article 370 acquired a permanent status with the cessation of the constituent assembly of J&K and whether the procedure adopted for its abrogation was valid
-
Political parties in Jammu and Kashmir on Tuesday welcomed the Supreme Court's decision to hear a batch of petitions challenging the abrogation of Article 370
-
The Centre must use the opportunity, created by the decline in militant violence, to bring J&K closer to lasting peace
-
"We will examine and give a date," said Chief Justice DY Chandrachud and Justice PS Narasimha as one of the petitioners in the case sought early listing of the matter.
-
The interval — a forced one — lasted over three decades. Entertainment is now making a comeback in the wounded Kashmir valley and will, hopefully, complement the efforts to provide a healing touch to the trouble-torn region. The reopening of movie theatres, more than 32 years after they were shut by terrorists and fundamentalists, is […]
