"article-370"

The apex court also upheld the validity of the decision to carve out the union territory of Ladakh from Jammu and Kashmir in August 2019.

Security forces have been deployed at many places in the valley to maintain law and order, they added.

Five-judge constitution bench comprising Chief Justice of India DY Chandrachud, Justices Sanjay Kishan Kaul, Sanjiv Khanna, BR Gavai, and Surya Kant will pass the judgement today.

The sudden spurt in violent attacks must prompt the Centre to introspect about its Kashmir policy

We can't ignore the decisions taken on August 5, 2019. The decision (Abrogation of Article 370) was not in accordance with the Constitution. It was unilateral and undemocratic, said Hasnain Masoodi

Five-judge Constitution bench of the Supreme Court reserves the judgement after hearing the arguments for 16 days

Earlier in the day, Additional Solicitor General K.M. Natraj contended that Article 370 is the only provision in the Constitution which has a self-destruction mechanism.

The Centre’s argument that the question of full statehood to J&K will be decided based on the degree of normalcy is misplaced

Senior advocate Kapil Sibal asked Centre to not make mockery of democracy after Solicitor General Mehta said that right people were under house arrest as there was no bandhs post abrogation of Article 370 in Jammu and Kashmir

Elections in Jammu and Kashmir can take place any time and a decision on the issue has to be taken by the poll panel, the Centre told the Supreme Court

Central government on Thursday told the Supreme Court that it cannot give any exact timeframe for the restoration of statehood in Jammu and Kashmir

The Supreme Court on Tuesday asked Attorney General and Solicitor General to seek instructions from the Central government over the timeframe to restore statehood of the erstwhile state of Jammu and Kashmir

A five-judge bench headed by Chief Justice D Y Chandrachud took note of the suspension of Zahoor Ahmad Bhat, who had argued before the top court on August 24 as petitioner in-person in the case

Though, the petitioners have themselves conceded before the Supreme Court that of course, the Indian Constitution is superior between the two Constitutions.

Supreme Court said on Thursday the surrender of Jammu and Kashmir's sovereignty to India was "absolutely complete" with the accession

Gains from revoking Article 370 can materialise only when Kashmiris are made partners in their own development

Chidambaram said, "Government of India's false claims about normalcy to the Supreme Court are exposed by their actions driven by paranoia."

Officials stated that stringent security measures have been implemented throughout the Union Territory to ensure peace and stability.

On August 5, 2019, the Centre revoked the special status of Jammu and Kashmir under Article 370.

The bench said that there are only two highly debatable issues -- whether Article 370 acquired a permanent status with the cessation of the constituent assembly of J&K and whether the procedure adopted for its abrogation was valid