The top court said power and accountability go hand in hand and noted that while all citizens shall have the 'right to information' under Section 3 of the Act
Supreme Court has sought the assistance of Attorney General R Venkataramani in a plea seeking to fix a time period for the Union government to notify appointment of judges
The apex court said it would take up the case as first item on August 21. The bench also sought a response from the state government and agencies concerned on the plea.
SC sought a response from the Centre on a PIL seeking a direction to decriminalise the law on statutory rape often invoked against 16- to 18-year-old adolescents for indulging in consensual sex.
In an important verdict, the top court also held the state government was not required to review its orders of detention every three months after it has passed the confirmatory order following the report of the advisory board.
The Supreme Court bench held that to deprive the state and its citizens of the benefit of these experienced judicial officers at a senior position would not be in public interest
Commenting on the remission policy of states, the bench said the question is whether the policy of premature release is being implemented uniformly in all cases in respect of all those who have completed 14 years and are eligible for it.
The SOP placed reliance upon the earlier judgments of the Supreme Court providing that courts should practice necessary restrain while summoning government officials during hearing of cases
Supreme Court provided several details in tabular form in its handbook which contains a glossary of gender unjust terms and phrases and suggests alternative words for being used in judicial discourses and decision making
CJI Chandrachud emphasised on granting access to justice to the citizens, saying the court provides a safe democratic space for individuals to seek protection of their lives
Speaking at the Independence Day celebrations organised by SCBA at the apex court lawns, the CJI also talked about efforts of the apex court to make all its 35,000 judgements available to citizens in regional languages
The apex court on June 12 had stayed the high court order that essentially allowed bike-taxi aggregators Rapido and Uber to operate in the national capital by asking the Delhi government not to take any coercive action against them till a new policy was formulated.
On August 7, the top court had refused to stay the Patna High Court's order giving the go-ahead for a caste survey in Bihar, and deferred the hearing on petitions challenging it to August 14.
The Trust has challenged an order of the Allahabad High Court which dismissed its plea to direct the Mathura civil judge to decide its application for a scientific survey of Krishna Janmabhoomi-Shahi Idgah mosque premises first before deciding the objections raised against the suit.