The real story behind the Congress government’s scrapped T-Hub move
Hyderabad’s Congress government is relocating hundreds of offices from rented to state-owned buildings to avoid clearing ₹1,300 crore in long-pending rental arrears. The move risks overcrowding, disrupted services, and local economic fallout, highlighting fiscal stress and planning gaps
Hyderabad: The Congress government’s sudden decision to shift hundreds of government offices out of rented buildings into State-owned premises, including the T-Hub, might have been projected as a cost-cutting exercise, but the underlying trigger, official sources confirm, is the government’s growing inability to clear long-pending rental arrears.
The State spends nearly Rs.800 crore annually towards rents for government offices, institutions, corporations and other bodies. While relocation may reduce this burden, officials sources confirmed that the immediate goal was to escape paying rental arrears amounting to around Rs.1,300 crore rather than implementing a planned consolidation.
Senior officials said rental dues have been pending for nearly 20 months, triggering sustained pressure from building owners. The urgency intensified as many rental contracts are expiring this month and building owners insisted for clearing arrears before renewing contracts.
Last year, some landlords locked welfare hostel buildings during summer holidays over unpaid rent, forcing the government to make some emergency payments. Fearing similar confrontations including the possibility of offices being sealed, the government reportedly issued blanket orders to vacate all rented spaces within tight deadlines, despite resistance from departments citing logistical and functional hurdles.
The fallout is visible on the ground. At several integrated Collectorate complexes, multiple departments are being crammed into single rooms. For instance, in Siddipet, five offices including Employment, Groundwater, Intermediate Education, Industries Centre and Industries Inspector, are temporarily accommodated to operate from one room, leaving officers without chambers and confusing the public.
The shift also exposed a planning gap. Several government buildings now being used were long avoided because they were dilapidated or unfinished. Some structures handed over after Andhra Pradesh’s bifurcation required major repairs, while newly built Collectorates under the previous BRS regime require internal infrastructure.
The broader economic ripple is equally telling. Government offices are not just administrative hubs. They sustain micro-economies of photocopy shops, eateries, transport services and small vendors. Their sudden relocation can drain commercial activity from localities that grew around them. In Narsingi, the owner of the building housing the Gandipet Sub-Registrar’s office reportedly wrote to authorities stating that he would forgo rent if the office stayed, citing its importance to village businesses and identity.
In education and welfare sectors, the implications are worse. Shifting schools and hostels in the middle of academic year disrupting students, particularly those from vulnerable backgrounds. With rent arrears for residential schools reportedly running into hundreds of crores, the relocation drive highlights how fiscal stress is spilling into essential services. The move would have severe impact in Hyderabad where more than 110 schools are running in private buildings against around 230 across the State, due to unavailability of required land and infrastructure.
Rather than a planned rationalisation of assets, the relocation wave appears to be a reactive measure which might trim rent bills but risks weakening service delivery, public convenience and institutional efficiency in the process. The decision also exposed the government’s inefficiency in managing cash flow pressures and mounting debts.
