Home |Telangana |Vemula Slams Revanth Reddy For Remarks On Kcr Ktr Called The Outbursts Signs Of Frustration
Vemula slams Revanth Reddy for remarks on KCR, KTR, called the outbursts signs of frustration
BRS MLA and former minister Vemula Prashanth Reddy launched a sharp counterattack against Chief Minister Revanth Reddy’s remarks at a Kodangal public meeting. He accused the CM of resorting to personal attacks due to frustration and failure to showcase achievements.
Hyderabad: In a sharp rebuttal, BRS MLA and former Minister Vemula Prashanth Reddy strongly condemned Chief Minister Revanth Reddy‘s comments made at a public meeting in Kodangal, targeting BRS leaders K. Chandrashekhar Rao and KT Rama Rao.
He said the Chief Minister’s remarks were lacking in political stature and born out of despair, frustration, and fear. He accused Revanth of resorting to personal attacks to divert public attention from his government’s failures.
Vemula said over 4,000 BRS-backed candidates were elected as sarpanches. This outcome had left Revanth mentally-blocked and out of sheer frustration, the Chief Minister was resorting to “crazy rants.”
He argued that Revanth’s inability to highlight his own achievements has pushed him towards baseless personal vilification.
“With nothing to boast about, Revanth Reddy is stooping to personal abuses,” Vemula stated.
The former minister dismissed Revanth’s allegations against the 10-year BRS regime as “laughable,” and asserted that KCR’s leadership had transformed Telangana into a national model for irrigation, welfare, and infrastructure. He refuted claims of neglect in the Palamuru region, pointing out that key projects like the Palamuru-Rangareddy Lift Irrigation Scheme, Kalwakurthy, Nettempadu, and Bhima were largely completed under BRS rule.
“Revanth lacks the moral authority to criticise K.Chandrashekhar Rao’s governance,” Vemula said, urging the CM to focus on facts rather than misleading the public.
He further criticised Revanth’s comments on KT Rama Rao as the “height of political degradation,” and suggested that they stem from a lack of courage to discuss real development and administration issues.