Wednesday, Apr 22, 2026
English News
  • Hyderabad
  • Telangana
  • AP News
  • India
  • World
  • Entertainment
  • Sport
  • Science and Tech
  • Business
  • Rewind
  • ...
    • NRI
    • View Point
    • cartoon
    • My Space
    • Education Today
    • Reviews
    • Property
    • Lifestyle
E-Paper
  • NRI
  • View Point
  • cartoon
  • My Space
  • Reviews
  • Education Today
  • Property
  • Lifestyle
Home | India | Plea Challenging Designation Of Lawyers As Senior Advocates Dismissed By Sc

Plea challenging designation of lawyers as senior advocates dismissed by SC

Supreme Court on Monday dismissed a petition challenging the designation of lawyers as senior advocates

By PTI
Published Date - 16 October 2023, 12:00 PM
Plea challenging designation of lawyers as senior advocates dismissed by SC
whatsapp facebook twitter telegram

New Delhi: The Supreme Court on Monday dismissed a petition challenging the designation of lawyers as senior advocates.

A bench headed by Justice Sanjay Kishan Kaul delivered its verdict on a plea filed by advocate Mathews J Nedumpara and seven others.

Also Read

  • SC lists plea of Sterlite copper unit of Tamil Nadu for hearing on November 29
  • SC to hear on Monday AAP leader Raghav Chadha’s plea against suspension from Rajya Sabha

The petitioners had challenged sections 16 and 23 (5) of the Advocates Act, 1961, claiming these “creates two classes of lawyers, senior advocates and other advocates, which in actual practice has resulted in unthinkable catastrophe and inequities which Parliament certainly would not have contemplated or foreseen”.

While section 16 of the Advocates Act pertains to senior and other advocates, section 23 (5) says senior advocates shall have pre-audience over other lawyers and their right of pre-audience inter se shall be determined by their respective seniority.

The plea had claimed that designation of lawyers as senior advocates, which is “creating a special class of advocates with special rights, privileges and status not available to ordinary advocates, is unconstitutional, being violative of the mandate of equality under Article 14…”.

  • Follow Us :
  • Tags
  • Advocates
  • lawyers
  • Supreme Court

Related News

  • Sabarimala hearing: SC backs limited judicial review on religious restrictions

    Sabarimala hearing: SC backs limited judicial review on religious restrictions

  • SC calls for humane, rights-based approach for disabled prisoners

    SC calls for humane, rights-based approach for disabled prisoners

  • SC warns against “scandalising” judiciary in Disha Salian case row

    SC warns against “scandalising” judiciary in Disha Salian case row

  • SC rejects Umar Khalid’s review plea in Delhi riots case

    SC rejects Umar Khalid’s review plea in Delhi riots case

Latest News

  • Khammam farmers hit streets over delays in crop procurement

    1 hour ago
  • Trump urges Iran to free right women before Islamabad talks

    2 hours ago
  • Jannik Sinner eyes strong run in Madrid before French Open

    2 hours ago
  • India wins gold, silver and bronze at ISSF Junior World Cup

    2 hours ago
  • Rajasthan Royals eye recovery against Lucknow Super Giants

    2 hours ago
  • Telangana High Court posts BrahMos DG appointment case to June 15

    2 hours ago
  • Falaknuma FC thrash Susai FC 8-0 in TFA C-Division league

    2 hours ago
  • Telangana footballer Alekhya to represent Pune club in Indian Women’s League finals

    2 hours ago

company

  • Home
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy

business

  • Subscribe

telangana today

  • Telangana
  • Hyderabad
  • Latest News
  • Entertainment
  • World
  • Andhra Pradesh
  • Science & Tech
  • Sport

follow us

  • Telangana Today Telangana Today
Telangana Today Telangana Today

© Copyrights 2024 TELANGANA PUBLICATIONS PVT. LTD. All rights reserved. Powered by Veegam

.