Monday, Jun 1, 2026
English News
  • Hyderabad
  • Telangana
  • AP News
  • India
  • World
  • Entertainment
  • Sport
  • Science and Tech
  • Business
  • Rewind
  • ...
    • NRI
    • View Point
    • cartoon
    • My Space
    • Education Today
    • Reviews
    • Property
    • Lifestyle
E-Paper
  • NRI
  • View Point
  • cartoon
  • My Space
  • Reviews
  • Education Today
  • Property
  • Lifestyle
Home | India | Plea Challenging Designation Of Lawyers As Senior Advocates Dismissed By Sc

Plea challenging designation of lawyers as senior advocates dismissed by SC

Supreme Court on Monday dismissed a petition challenging the designation of lawyers as senior advocates

By PTI
Published Date - 16 October 2023, 12:00 PM
Plea challenging designation of lawyers as senior advocates dismissed by SC
whatsapp facebook twitter telegram

New Delhi: The Supreme Court on Monday dismissed a petition challenging the designation of lawyers as senior advocates.

A bench headed by Justice Sanjay Kishan Kaul delivered its verdict on a plea filed by advocate Mathews J Nedumpara and seven others.

Also Read

  • SC lists plea of Sterlite copper unit of Tamil Nadu for hearing on November 29
  • SC to hear on Monday AAP leader Raghav Chadha’s plea against suspension from Rajya Sabha

The petitioners had challenged sections 16 and 23 (5) of the Advocates Act, 1961, claiming these “creates two classes of lawyers, senior advocates and other advocates, which in actual practice has resulted in unthinkable catastrophe and inequities which Parliament certainly would not have contemplated or foreseen”.

While section 16 of the Advocates Act pertains to senior and other advocates, section 23 (5) says senior advocates shall have pre-audience over other lawyers and their right of pre-audience inter se shall be determined by their respective seniority.

The plea had claimed that designation of lawyers as senior advocates, which is “creating a special class of advocates with special rights, privileges and status not available to ordinary advocates, is unconstitutional, being violative of the mandate of equality under Article 14…”.

  • Follow Us :
  • Tags
  • Advocates
  • lawyers
  • Supreme Court

Related News

  • SC: Temporary staff doing same work cannot be denied benefits

    SC: Temporary staff doing same work cannot be denied benefits

  • PIL in SC seeks detailed disclosure of West Bengal voter roll revisions

    PIL in SC seeks detailed disclosure of West Bengal voter roll revisions

  • SC seeks Centre’s response on disability commission compliance plea

    SC seeks Centre’s response on disability commission compliance plea

  • SC gets second woman judge appointed directly from the Bar

    SC gets second woman judge appointed directly from the Bar

Latest News

  • Opinion: KCR — the architect of Telangana’s destiny

    1 min ago
  • Revanth Reddy says Fadnavis ignoring Telangana’s requests on Tummidihatti project

    15 mins ago
  • TGEJAC seeks slab-based EHS contribution model in Telangana

    20 mins ago
  • Telangana Medical Council detects unethical practices at Banjara Hills skin clinic

    1 hour ago
  • Cyberabad police bust interstate online banking fraud racket

    1 hour ago
  • Karimnagar police arrested most wanted criminal absconding ten years

    1 hour ago
  • Inebriated man slips into open well in Medak, rescued

    1 hour ago
  • Former Sarpanches prevented from heading towards CM’s camp office, arrested

    1 hour ago

company

  • Home
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy

business

  • Subscribe

telangana today

  • Telangana
  • Hyderabad
  • Latest News
  • Entertainment
  • World
  • Andhra Pradesh
  • Science & Tech
  • Sport

follow us

  • Telangana Today Telangana Today
Telangana Today Telangana Today

© Copyrights 2024 TELANGANA PUBLICATIONS PVT. LTD. All rights reserved. Powered by Veegam