Wednesday, Nov 11, 2026
English News
  • Hyderabad
  • Telangana
  • AP News
  • India
  • World
  • Entertainment
  • Sport
  • Science and Tech
  • Business
  • Rewind
  • ...
    • NRI
    • View Point
    • cartoon
    • My Space
    • Education Today
    • Reviews
    • Property
    • Lifestyle
E-Paper
  • NRI
  • View Point
  • cartoon
  • My Space
  • Reviews
  • Education Today
  • Property
  • Lifestyle
Home | India | Plea Challenging Designation Of Lawyers As Senior Advocates Dismissed By Sc

Plea challenging designation of lawyers as senior advocates dismissed by SC

Supreme Court on Monday dismissed a petition challenging the designation of lawyers as senior advocates

By PTI
Published Date - 16 October 2023, 12:00 PM
Plea challenging designation of lawyers as senior advocates dismissed by SC
whatsapp facebook twitter telegram

New Delhi: The Supreme Court on Monday dismissed a petition challenging the designation of lawyers as senior advocates.

A bench headed by Justice Sanjay Kishan Kaul delivered its verdict on a plea filed by advocate Mathews J Nedumpara and seven others.

Also Read

  • SC lists plea of Sterlite copper unit of Tamil Nadu for hearing on November 29
  • SC to hear on Monday AAP leader Raghav Chadha’s plea against suspension from Rajya Sabha

The petitioners had challenged sections 16 and 23 (5) of the Advocates Act, 1961, claiming these “creates two classes of lawyers, senior advocates and other advocates, which in actual practice has resulted in unthinkable catastrophe and inequities which Parliament certainly would not have contemplated or foreseen”.

While section 16 of the Advocates Act pertains to senior and other advocates, section 23 (5) says senior advocates shall have pre-audience over other lawyers and their right of pre-audience inter se shall be determined by their respective seniority.

The plea had claimed that designation of lawyers as senior advocates, which is “creating a special class of advocates with special rights, privileges and status not available to ordinary advocates, is unconstitutional, being violative of the mandate of equality under Article 14…”.

Join Our Whatsapp Channel
  • Follow Us :
As preferred source
  • Tags
  • Advocates
  • lawyers
  • Supreme Court

Related News

  • SC asks WhatsApp to detail steps to prevent digital arrest scams

    SC asks WhatsApp to detail steps to prevent digital arrest scams

  • Firecracker timing violations: Over 200 cases filed across Delhi

    Firecracker timing violations: Over 200 cases filed across Delhi

  • SC upholds Delhi HC ruling on National Book Trust’s status

    SC upholds Delhi HC ruling on National Book Trust’s status

  • Supreme Court takes contempt action over Congress post targeting CJI

    Supreme Court takes contempt action over Congress post targeting CJI

Latest News

  • Esha Singh, Manu Bhaker lead India to 25m pistol team gold

    4 hours ago
  • SDRF finds body of missing youth while searching for boat in Khammam

    4 hours ago
  • Telangana Congress puts 20 media appointments made by MP Chamala on hold

    4 hours ago
  • 15-year-old boy allegedly murdered after witnessing couple together in Khammam

    5 hours ago
  • Bhainsa municipal commissioner caught accepting Rs 50,000 bribe

    5 hours ago
  • Telangana opens registrations for Global Summit 2026

    5 hours ago
  • Singareni to supply 75,000 tonnes of coal daily to Telangana GENCO

    5 hours ago
  • Future Stars thrash Zinda Tilismath by 252 runs in HCA B-Division league

    5 hours ago

company

  • Home
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy

business

  • Subscribe

telangana today

  • Telangana
  • Hyderabad
  • Latest News
  • Entertainment
  • World
  • Andhra Pradesh
  • Science & Tech
  • Sport

follow us

  • Telangana Today Telangana Today
Telangana Today Telangana Today

© Copyrights 2024 TELANGANA PUBLICATIONS PVT. LTD. All rights reserved. Powered by Veegam

Telangana Today App