Monday, Jun 22, 2026
English News
  • Hyderabad
  • Telangana
  • AP News
  • India
  • World
  • Entertainment
  • Sport
  • Science and Tech
  • Business
  • Rewind
  • ...
    • NRI
    • View Point
    • cartoon
    • My Space
    • Education Today
    • Reviews
    • Property
    • Lifestyle
E-Paper
  • NRI
  • View Point
  • cartoon
  • My Space
  • Reviews
  • Education Today
  • Property
  • Lifestyle
Home | India | Plea Challenging Designation Of Lawyers As Senior Advocates Dismissed By Sc

Plea challenging designation of lawyers as senior advocates dismissed by SC

Supreme Court on Monday dismissed a petition challenging the designation of lawyers as senior advocates

By PTI
Published Date - 16 October 2023, 12:00 PM
Plea challenging designation of lawyers as senior advocates dismissed by SC
whatsapp facebook twitter telegram

New Delhi: The Supreme Court on Monday dismissed a petition challenging the designation of lawyers as senior advocates.

A bench headed by Justice Sanjay Kishan Kaul delivered its verdict on a plea filed by advocate Mathews J Nedumpara and seven others.

Also Read

  • SC lists plea of Sterlite copper unit of Tamil Nadu for hearing on November 29
  • SC to hear on Monday AAP leader Raghav Chadha’s plea against suspension from Rajya Sabha

The petitioners had challenged sections 16 and 23 (5) of the Advocates Act, 1961, claiming these “creates two classes of lawyers, senior advocates and other advocates, which in actual practice has resulted in unthinkable catastrophe and inequities which Parliament certainly would not have contemplated or foreseen”.

While section 16 of the Advocates Act pertains to senior and other advocates, section 23 (5) says senior advocates shall have pre-audience over other lawyers and their right of pre-audience inter se shall be determined by their respective seniority.

The plea had claimed that designation of lawyers as senior advocates, which is “creating a special class of advocates with special rights, privileges and status not available to ordinary advocates, is unconstitutional, being violative of the mandate of equality under Article 14…”.

  • Follow Us :
  • Tags
  • Advocates
  • lawyers
  • Supreme Court

Related News

  • SC refuses interim stay on CBSE three-language policy for Class 9

    SC refuses interim stay on CBSE three-language policy for Class 9

  • Need to protect forest ecosystems, says SC

    Need to protect forest ecosystems, says SC

  • SC to hear SEBI plea in Sahara OFCD case against SAT relief order

    SC to hear SEBI plea in Sahara OFCD case against SAT relief order

  • CJI takes strong note of allegation about case file being misplaced by SC registry

    CJI takes strong note of allegation about case file being misplaced by SC registry

Latest News

  • FIFA WC: Yamal shines as Spain crush Saudi Arabia 4-0

    9 hours ago
  • Anvita Khammam Aces beat Palamuru Strikers in high-scoring TG20 opener

    9 hours ago
  • NEET re-exam: Student held for cheating with hidden phone in Hyderabad

    9 hours ago
  • Editorial: Self-reliance arms defence

    9 hours ago
  • Opinion: India’s fiscal social contract at crossroads — revenue, welfare and reform

    9 hours ago
  • India beat Netherlands 3–2 in thrilling FIH Pro League clash in Rotterdam

    9 hours ago
  • Kapp’s unbeaten 81 powers South Africa to six-wicket win over India in Women’s T20 World Cup

    9 hours ago
  • Afghanistan captain Hashmatullah Shahidi reprimanded for ICC Code of Conduct breach in third ODI

    10 hours ago

company

  • Home
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy

business

  • Subscribe

telangana today

  • Telangana
  • Hyderabad
  • Latest News
  • Entertainment
  • World
  • Andhra Pradesh
  • Science & Tech
  • Sport

follow us

  • Telangana Today Telangana Today
Telangana Today Telangana Today

© Copyrights 2024 TELANGANA PUBLICATIONS PVT. LTD. All rights reserved. Powered by Veegam