"telangana-high-court"

Advocate Venu Madhav’s petition argued that the State government had flagrantly violated court orders prohibiting the immersion of idols, particularly Plaster of Paris (POP) idols, at Tank Bund.

The HC order came in response to three petitions filed in 2018, 2019 and 2020 by the Telangana State Backward Classes Welfare Association and individuals including Jajula Srinivas Goud and Dasoju Sravan Kumar

Telangana High Court has directed the State Education Department and the All India Council for Technical Education (AICTE) to conduct a fresh mop-up round of TGEAPCET 2024-25 counselling for engineering courses for the academic year 2024-25.

He cited the Supreme Court's judgement on the party defections earlier, pointing out that the apex court had previously ruled that decisions on such complaints should be made within three months.

In a statement, Harish Rao announced that the High Court's ruling upheld the disqualification of MLAs who defected from their parties, leading to by-elections in their constituencies. He expressed confidence that the BRS would win these bypolls and hoped that the Assembly Speaker would implement the High Court's decision within the next four weeks.

In a case filed by the BRS seeking the disqualification of MLAs for defecting to the Congress, the High Court has directed the Assembly Secretary to submit a status report within four weeks. If the report is not filed, the Court will consider reopening the case on its own initiative.

Dileep, known for his vocal criticism of the Congress government’s actions, was picked up from his residence.

Telangana High Court issued a restraining order against HYDRAA and other authorities, prohibiting them from taking any immediate action against NVN Constructions Pvt Ltd concerning a 13.17-acre plot in Kukatpally Village, Medchal - Malkajgiri.

The bench, comprising Chief Justice Alok Aradhe and Justice J. Sreenivas Rao ordered that the status quo be maintained concerning a 7-acre piece of land located in Pokalagudem Village, Khammam District. This decision comes amid an ongoing legal dispute involving appellants Gajula Laxmaian and others.

The directive came following a writ petition filed by Gayatri Educational and Cultural Trust, Anurag University, and Neelima College of Medical Sciences, which are operated by a group headed by BRS MLA Palla Rajeshwar Reddy.

Chief Justice Alok Aradhe and Justice J. Sreenivas Rao has directed that notices issued by the Deputy Collector and Tahsildar to Kavuri Hills residents regarding alleged encroachments on the Full Tank Level (FTL) limits of Durgam Cheruvu be treated as show cause notices.

The court's intervention came in response to a petition challenging the university's decision to extend the merit list from 2022 for the current year's admissions.

Justice Bollaram Vijaysen Reddy came down heavily on the HYDRAA following a batch of writ pleas filed by residents of the Kavuri Hills challenging the notices against the encroachment of the FTL limits of Durgam Cheruvu.

Nagarjuna, who insisted that the demolition was unlawful and that the structure was not illegal, moved the High Court immediately, following which Justice Vinod Kumar directed HYDRA to maintain status quo over demolition

The Telangana High Court on Friday directed the Telangana Council for Higher Education, The Convenor TG LAWCET and PGLCET 2024, Bar Council of India and Osmania University to treat transgender candidates as a separate category entitled to horizontal reservation in law course admissions.

This expansion plan would integrate several municipalities, municipal corporations, and gram panchayats into the GHMC’s administrative framework.

Justice K Lakshman directed the agency to adhere to legal procedures before demolishing structures identified as illegal. The judge also voiced concern over possible discrimination in HYDRA's approach, stating that it could not go and demolish structures 'just like that'.

The bench considering the gravity of the incident has taken suo moto PIL and directed the State to apprise the court with regard to feasibility of enactment of Advocates Protection Act.

The Judge after hearing the said submissions, enquired about the power and jurisdiction of the Women's Commission in issuing summons.

The judge expressed dissatisfaction for the delay on part of the State and expressed urgency in the matter.