"telangana-high-court"

The division bench dealt with a Public Interest litigation case filed by VATA foundation challenging the inaction of Commissioner of Manikonda Municipality.

The CBI alleged that Nimmagadda Prasad, who is arrayed as Accused No. 3, played a key role in the corruption of several crores among other allegations.

MA&UD, GHMC authorities to appraise the court regarding land acquisition compensation claim awaited by the petitioner since 2008.

The judge was dealing with an election petition filed by opposition party candidate Banothu Madanlal, an ex-MLA residing in Khammam District.

Zarina Begum and others filed a writ plea challenging the inaction of the Municipal authorities in taking steps to remove the illegal and unauthorized constructions.

A 12-year-old girl conceives after being gangraped by ten men. Gandhi hospital refuses to medically terminate her pregnancy, following which victim's mother moved the Telangana High Court

The bench speaking through the Chief Justice questioned why there was no progress despite the public interest litigation case being pending.

The allegations are that he has organised an event at the Martyrs Memorial during the 2023 Assembly elections when the Model Code of Conduct was in effect.

Justice N V Shravan Kumar observed that temples cannot function with a commercial outlook to augment income. If there is requirement to meet the expenditure of temple, the State has to substitute for the same, the judge commented.

Justice K Lakshman observed that the allegations levelled against the petitioner were grave.

No evidence was placed in the chargesheet to attract offences against Chandrashekar Rao, he said, adding that the polie had filed a chargesheet in 2023, splitting the case, and showing Chandrashekhar Rao as absconding.

The complaint reveals that the members came near Dr.B.R. Ambedkar statue by raising slogans and started Dharna, without taking any permission and obstructed free flow of traffic by wrongfully restraining the vehicles.

According to the prosecution, the family members of the Accused no.1 including women with deadly weapons went to the house of the victims at 6:15 am, attacked them and committed the ghastly act. The Sessions court had acquitted the accused for lack of evidence.

Observing the same, the judge issued directions to ensure reservations are implemented in accordance with law and granted the TSPSC time to submit its response through counter.

The petitioners also pointed out the inaction of the association in not addressing the most serious problem with respect to the internal roads of a gated community. The government pleader contended that they were ready to lay the roads.

The petitioners said following protests on the campus on April 27 this year, the Chief Warden of the University issued a circular on April 29, declaring summer vacations and closing down the hostels and messes till May 31.

The teacher job aspirants had even prevented MLC-elect Chintapandu Naveen aka Teenmar Mallanna from entering the CM's house for some time.

After hearing the elaborate arguments on the position and power of the Speaker in dealing with the disqualification petitions, the Judge admitted the matter and directed the AG and others to file counters if any. The matter was posted to June 27 for further hearing.

Though the judge reiterated that such action would result in speedy disposal of the case, the AG affirmed that it would not be possible fix a particular date for the Speaker.

The two cases were filed at Chevella and Mokilla police stations. D Prakash Reddy, senior counsel representing the petitioners contended that the criminal complaints are vague and civil disputes are pending between the complainant and petitioners. Referring to the complaint, he said the details of the civil cases were suppressed.