The bail application of the second accused, Tarun Raju, was also rejected. A bench, headed by Justice Savanur Vishwajith Shetty, passed the order in this regard
The company raised concerns over the Centre's interpretation of the IT Act, particularly its use of Section 79(3)(b), which 'X' argues violates Supreme Court rulings and undermines free expression online
The bench headed by Pradeep Singh Yerur passed the order on Friday while considering Yediyurappa's petition to quash the charge sheet filed against him. The court observed that a comprehensive investigation was needed in the case and, accordingly, stayed both the summons and the court's cognizance of the matter
The bench stated that availing medical treatment is the right of an undertrial and granted interim bail for six weeks to get treatment for severe back pain
The high court passed the order after the counsel for the central government admitted that except for government bodies, no private entity or stakeholder was heard before the earlier notification was issued.
The bench headed by Justice PrasannaB. Varale and Justice Krishna S. Dixit also directed the Secretary in the Urban Development Department to personally attend the court proceedings on November 2.
A bench of Justices Aniruddha Bose and Bela M. Trivedi deferred hearing the plea for a period of three weeks. The matter is likely to come up for hearing on October 16 as per the details available on the website of the apex court.
Karnataka High Court has disposed of a batch of petitions challenging the Hubli-Ankola railway line project after the Railways submitted that a fresh proposal is being worked out
The petitioner Sowmya Reddy contended that she was ahead in the counting of votes of Electronic Voting Machies. But, things changed while counting postal ballot votes
According to reports, the Karnataka High Court pointed to deaths due to potholes, besides observing that BBMP seemed to be engaged in cosmetic surgery of roads in the Bengaluru.
Senior advocate Huzefa Ahmadi, representing some of the petitioners, submitted that the argument of PFI was not raised before the high court and it is an argument introduced to create prejudice.