-
The case was booked against the duo in the issue alleging misappropriation of government funds in the construction of Medigadda barrage
-
Reprimands the official for failure to comply with its orders; adjourns the matter to February 17 for further hearing
-
Move comes after former DCP P Radha Kishan Rao, the accused in the case, files anticipatory bail petition
-
The Bench was dealing with a Suo moto public interest litigation case concerning the issuance of final notification on the water bodies
-
The petitioners sought to quash the criminal proceedings pending against them before the Special Judge at Nampally for MP/MLA cases
-
Warns that if the order is not complied with by the specified date, authorities from the School Education Department, including the Principal Secretary, must appear before court in person
-
Case pertains to allegations that Revanth illegally used a drone to photograph a farmhouse in Janwada, which was allegedly misrepresented as being owned by KT Rama Rao
-
The petitioner contended that the case was registered just by relying on the statements of Gadhagoni Chakradhar recorded in the case
-
Directs government to ensure a legally compliant appointment within four months, allowing the interim CEO, Shaik Liyakat Hussain, to continue in the meantime
-
Dismisses public interest litigation filed by social activist Jetty Umeshwar Rao
-
Directs university to provide edit option, AICTE to create credentials to SVIT
-
The bench was dealing with a public interest litigation case filed by Koti Raghunatha Rao, an advocate, challenging the allocation of 3.7 acres of Govt land situated at plot No 27 in Sy No 83/1 Raidurg, Sherlingampally, RR District to IAMC, Hyderabad.
-
The judge questioned the petitioner on the rationale behind making the Chief Minister a party to the writ petition and directed the high court registry to remove the Chief Minister’s name from the list of respondents, highlighting the need for careful consideration of inclusion of parties to the legal proceedings.
-
Justice Reddy specifically noted in the order that, police shall not interfere with personal liberty of the petitioner under the guise of investigation. Petitioner counsel E Venkata Siddartha, told court that the petitioner was dealing with a civil case against the complainant since 2019 and that the police are acting hand in glove with the complainant Marripalli Srinivas to pressurise the petitioner and his client to settle ongoing civil dispute.
-
Public interest litigation case filed by Gavinolla Srinivas challenging actions of the State, Municipal and Panchayat authorities
-
Criminal petition was filed seeking quashing of an FIR registered at PS Pocharam, IT Corridor, Rachakonda
-
These farmers had supplied livestock to TSSGDCF as part of State's Sheep Distribution scheme aimed at boosting sheep population
-
The case pertained to KTR and party workers participating in a meeting on May 30, 2024, in violation of the election code
-
Says the notification was concerning 24 stray pieces of plots at different phases of KPHB, and the same were not numbered as per the sanctioned layout
-
Rules that the government authorities should accept the IPE 2025 examination fee from students without the imposition of late fee