-
Justice Lakshman expresses serious dissatisfaction over the agency for demolishing structures by violating rules
-
The court was dealing with a PIL filed by one Boddupalli Srinivasulu challenging the inaction of authorities in filling the posts of Additional and Assistant Public Prosecutors in the State
-
Petitioner filed public interest litigation case challenging actions of Revenue Land Administration Department and others for allotting six acres 35 guntas at Khanamet village in Serilingampally mandal to the organisation for a community bhavan at Rs 100 per acre
-
K Veera Raghava Reddy, in his petition, said that the FIR was filed with an ulterior motive and as such there was a delay in filing
-
The case was booked against the duo in the issue alleging misappropriation of government funds in the construction of Medigadda barrage
-
Reprimands the official for failure to comply with its orders; adjourns the matter to February 17 for further hearing
-
Move comes after former DCP P Radha Kishan Rao, the accused in the case, files anticipatory bail petition
-
The Bench was dealing with a Suo moto public interest litigation case concerning the issuance of final notification on the water bodies
-
The petitioners sought to quash the criminal proceedings pending against them before the Special Judge at Nampally for MP/MLA cases
-
Warns that if the order is not complied with by the specified date, authorities from the School Education Department, including the Principal Secretary, must appear before court in person
-
Case pertains to allegations that Revanth illegally used a drone to photograph a farmhouse in Janwada, which was allegedly misrepresented as being owned by KT Rama Rao
-
The petitioner contended that the case was registered just by relying on the statements of Gadhagoni Chakradhar recorded in the case
-
Directs government to ensure a legally compliant appointment within four months, allowing the interim CEO, Shaik Liyakat Hussain, to continue in the meantime
-
Dismisses public interest litigation filed by social activist Jetty Umeshwar Rao
-
Directs university to provide edit option, AICTE to create credentials to SVIT
-
The bench was dealing with a public interest litigation case filed by Koti Raghunatha Rao, an advocate, challenging the allocation of 3.7 acres of Govt land situated at plot No 27 in Sy No 83/1 Raidurg, Sherlingampally, RR District to IAMC, Hyderabad.
-
The judge questioned the petitioner on the rationale behind making the Chief Minister a party to the writ petition and directed the high court registry to remove the Chief Minister’s name from the list of respondents, highlighting the need for careful consideration of inclusion of parties to the legal proceedings.
-
Justice Reddy specifically noted in the order that, police shall not interfere with personal liberty of the petitioner under the guise of investigation. Petitioner counsel E Venkata Siddartha, told court that the petitioner was dealing with a civil case against the complainant since 2019 and that the police are acting hand in glove with the complainant Marripalli Srinivas to pressurise the petitioner and his client to settle ongoing civil dispute.
-
Public interest litigation case filed by Gavinolla Srinivas challenging actions of the State, Municipal and Panchayat authorities
-
Criminal petition was filed seeking quashing of an FIR registered at PS Pocharam, IT Corridor, Rachakonda