"telangana-hc"

Petitioners challenge allotment of their land by the government to 11 beneficiaries under Lavoni Patta

Several posts vacant for years, says petitioner; hearing adjourned to March 5

The court was dealing with writ plea filed by Head Constable Allapur Janardhan challenging the actions of Police Department

There is possibility of delay in trial as investigating agency yet to complete inquiry, notes judge

Directs university to provide edit option, AICTE to create credentials to SVIT

The BRS MLA is ready to cooperate with the investigation and he would appear before police if required, says petitioner’s counsel

The court states that Dr MA Saiff Ali must undergo special training, if required, by the University or College, before being allowed to sit for the exams

The court, which had reserved its decision on November 20 following a petition by Bharat Rashtra Samithi (BRS) leader Patnam Narender Reddy’s wife, delivered its verdict on Friday. Shurthi, the wife of the former MLA, had challenged the registration of three First Information Reports (FIRs) for the same incident. Justice K. Lakshman, after considering the arguments presented by Reddy’s counsel, decided to quash two of the FIRs.

The decision came following a writ petition filed by Katikam Raja Reddy, representing local farmers concerned about the environmental impact of the industrial project.

The petitioners argued that the ordinance was introduced without proper consultation or data collection from the affected villagers, alleging that the decision is motivated by interests in real estate development rather than community welfare.

The HC order came in response to three petitions filed in 2018, 2019 and 2020 by the Telangana State Backward Classes Welfare Association and individuals including Jajula Srinivas Goud and Dasoju Sravan Kumar

Telangana HC dealt with a unique case, after an elderly man approached the court stating that CCTV cameras installed near his home were invading his privacy.

Nagarjuna, who insisted that the demolition was unlawful and that the structure was not illegal, moved the High Court immediately, following which Justice Vinod Kumar directed HYDRA to maintain status quo over demolition

The Judge after hearing the said submissions, enquired about the power and jurisdiction of the Women's Commission in issuing summons.

The division bench comprising Justice K. Lakshman and Justice P. Sreesudha dealt with a writ appeal filed by Joshi Madhavi wife of P. Venkata Bala Ganesh, aggrieved by the order of single judge which directed the central government to take its decision on remission.

Ravi Krishna Vattem, an advocate filed this PIL seeking directions to constitute a Task force/anti-counterfeit pesticides Committee to conduct a joint inspection to contain the counterfeit pesticides.

Human Rights and Consumer Protection Cell Trust challenged illegal and unauthorized constructions by the National Institute of Tourism and Hospitality Management in the FTL buffer zone of water body Rammamma Kunta Lake.

The bench comprising Chief Justice Alok Aradhe and Justice J. Anil Kumar observed that “nearly after lapse of one year, till today, the order passed on July 27, 2023 has not been complied with”.

The court directed the State government to immediately formulate a comprehensive action plan to tackle the growing issue of stray dogs in Hyderabad within a week.

Senior counsel L Ravi Chander, representing the petitioners, argued that the Endowment department had violated the religious rights guaranteed under Constitution by seeking options from the Archakas of various temples to give options for their transfer from one temple to another.