"supreme-court-of-india"

Yesterday, Pakistan dismissed the Indian Supreme Court's verdict upholding the abrogation of Article 370 as having "no legal value," emphasizing that international law does not recognize India's "unilateral and illegal actions" of August 5, 2019.

Chief Justice D.Y. Chandrachud acknowledged security concerns but emphasized that direct elections, a crucial aspect of India's representative democracy, should not be delayed until statehood is restored.

Shah welcomed the verdict, stating that since the visionary decision by Prime Minister Narendra Modi on August 5, 2019, to revoke Article 370, peace and normalcy had returned to Jammu and Kashmir.

36 queer collectives from law schools across the country issued a statement condemning the BCI’s remarks that ask the apex court to let Parliament deal with the matter of same-sex marriage.   

Solicitor General Tushar Mehta said, "The real question is who would take a call on what constitutes marriage and between whom."

The Bharatiya Janata Party-led central government has been opposing the petitions and said that same-sex marriages do not fit into the Indian template of a family.

Rahul Gandhi will now have to appeal in Gujarat High Court or Supreme Court against the Surat court's order.

Seeking an independent expert committee Advocate Vishal Tiwari moved the apex court on Sunday and also sought an inquiry into the 183 encounters that have taken place in Uttar Pradesh since 2017.

"The power of mediation is understated, it has deep roots in the ancient India and Indian society," Justice NV Ramana, Former Chief Justice, Supreme Court of India said.

Dama Seshadri Naidu, the Chief Justice of India, D.Y. Chandrachud, said the case would be heard on April 14 and not April 10 due to the list of cases prepared for that day.

A bench of Chief Justice D Y Chandrachud and Justices P S Narasimha and J B Pardiwala is likely to deliver its verdict over setting up of a panel of domain experts for strengthening existing regulatory measures for stock markets.

Rejecting Arif's review petition, a bench headed by Chief Justice U.U. Lalit said, "affirm the view taken by this court...reject the review petition".

While Justice Hemant Gupta dismissed the appeals against the high court verdict, Justice Sudhanshu Dhulia allowed them.

A bench headed by Justice D.Y. Chandrachud said the exclusion of unmarried women, who conceive out of live-in relationship, from the Medical Termination of Pregnancy Rules is unconstitutional.

The plea submitted that using religion to lure voters is strictly prohibited under section 123 of RPA citing the secular values of the Constitution.

New Delhi: An unmarried woman on Tuesday approached the Supreme Court of India against the Delhi High Court which refused to grant permission to abort her 24-week-old pregnancy out of a consensual sexual relationship. Advocate Amit Mishra appeared for the woman on Tuesday and mentioned the matter before the bench headed by the Chief Justice […]

Mansa: Several attempts were made to attack Sidhu Moose Wala during the Punjab assembly elections in April and the Aam Aadmi Party-led state “government too left no stone unturned” to curtail his security and “publicized” the withdrawal of his security, said Balkaur Singh, father of the Punjabi singer-politician. “Sixty to eighty people were after him […]

Hyderabad: This is in continuation of last article on Constitutional Bodies and focuses on the functioning and duties of Comptroller and Auditor General. COMPTROLLER AND AUDITOR GENERAL Articles 148 to 151 in Part V of the Constitution of India, deal with the office of the Comptroller and Auditor General. CAG is an independent authority under […]

This change is definitely not inspired by a change of heart, but forced by fear of elections

In addition, the services provided by e-commerce platforms have not been limited to metros and Tier-I cities, but have been increasingly availed of by people in Tier II and III towns in India.