"telangana-high-court"

Justice K Lakshman observed that the allegations levelled against the petitioner were grave.

No evidence was placed in the chargesheet to attract offences against Chandrashekar Rao, he said, adding that the polie had filed a chargesheet in 2023, splitting the case, and showing Chandrashekhar Rao as absconding.

The complaint reveals that the members came near Dr.B.R. Ambedkar statue by raising slogans and started Dharna, without taking any permission and obstructed free flow of traffic by wrongfully restraining the vehicles.

According to the prosecution, the family members of the Accused no.1 including women with deadly weapons went to the house of the victims at 6:15 am, attacked them and committed the ghastly act. The Sessions court had acquitted the accused for lack of evidence.

Observing the same, the judge issued directions to ensure reservations are implemented in accordance with law and granted the TSPSC time to submit its response through counter.

The petitioners also pointed out the inaction of the association in not addressing the most serious problem with respect to the internal roads of a gated community. The government pleader contended that they were ready to lay the roads.

The petitioners said following protests on the campus on April 27 this year, the Chief Warden of the University issued a circular on April 29, declaring summer vacations and closing down the hostels and messes till May 31.

The teacher job aspirants had even prevented MLC-elect Chintapandu Naveen aka Teenmar Mallanna from entering the CM's house for some time.

After hearing the elaborate arguments on the position and power of the Speaker in dealing with the disqualification petitions, the Judge admitted the matter and directed the AG and others to file counters if any. The matter was posted to June 27 for further hearing.

Though the judge reiterated that such action would result in speedy disposal of the case, the AG affirmed that it would not be possible fix a particular date for the Speaker.

The two cases were filed at Chevella and Mokilla police stations. D Prakash Reddy, senior counsel representing the petitioners contended that the criminal complaints are vague and civil disputes are pending between the complainant and petitioners. Referring to the complaint, he said the details of the civil cases were suppressed.

The program was attended by 100 officers from different ranks along with faculty members from various law schools, including Mahindra University.

He said that he won in the polls by contesting on the ticket of the BRS. He hoped that he would be able to secure a stay from the Supreme Court against the judgment of HC.

The PIL case was filed by Akula Satish, a social worker. Petitioner challenged the inaction of Irrigation and CAD Department, HMDA, District collector and other government officials in taking steps for demolishing llegal constructions in the subject land.

It may be recalled that Venkat Rao Tellam and Kadiyam Srihari who got elected from BRS party, defected and joined Indian National Congress party on April 7 and March 31, 2024 respectively.

A division bench comprising Chief Justice Alok Aradhe and Justice Anil Kumar Jukanti took on record the assurance given by ECI that appropriate action in accordance with law would be taken by Friday.

106 employees include 38 employees from SERP and 68 from NREGS.

BRS Medak Lok Sabha candidate P Venkatrami Reddy has said that Raghunandan has attempted to push the lives of these 106 employees into crisis by complaining against them.

The Bench directed the Board to place before it the copies of directions issued and adjourned the matter.

Manikya Reddy filed this writ appeal in the year 2014 challenging the single bench order of dismissing his writ plea wherein the writ plea, he challenged the waqf tribunal order of declaring his property as waqf property.